0.02/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.02/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 960
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 120
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:09:15 EDT 2022
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.40	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.15/0.40	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.40	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_9 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting sh1l with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# sh1l with pid 4878 completed with status 0
0.15/0.41	# Result found by sh1l
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_9 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting sh1l with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.41	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSS00-SHSSMFNN
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# new_ho_10 with pid 4882 completed with status 0
0.15/0.41	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_9 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting sh1l with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.41	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSS00-SHSSMFNN
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.41	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.41	
0.15/0.41	# Proof found!
0.15/0.41	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.41	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_23, type, is_a: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_24, type, emptyset: $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_25, type, unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_26, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_27, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_28, type, excl_union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_29, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_30, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_31, type, complement: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_32, type, disjoint: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_33, type, subset: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_34, type, meets: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_35, type, misses: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_36, type, epred1_0: $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_37, type, epred2_0: $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_38, type, epred3_0: $i > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_39, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.15/0.41	thf(union, axiom, ((union)=(^[X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X5 @ X4)|(X6 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax', union)).
0.15/0.41	thf(intersection, axiom, ((intersection)=(^[X9:$i > $o, X10:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X9 @ X4)&(X10 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax', intersection)).
0.15/0.41	thf(union_distributes_over_intersection, conjecture, ![X22:$i > $o, X23:$i > $o, X24:$i > $o]:(((union @ X22 @ (intersection @ X23 @ X24))=(intersection @ (union @ X22 @ X23) @ (union @ X22 @ X24)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', union_distributes_over_intersection)).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_3, plain, ((union)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[union])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((intersection)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)&(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(![X22:$i > $o, X23:$i > $o, X24:$i > $o, X28:$i]:((((X22 @ X28)|((X23 @ X28)&(X24 @ X28)))<=>(((X22 @ X28)|(X23 @ X28))&((X22 @ X28)|(X24 @ X28)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[union_distributes_over_intersection]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((((~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))&(~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)))&((~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))&(~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))))&(((~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))&(~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0))))&((~(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))&(~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(~(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|~(epred3_0 @ esk1_0))))))&((((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)))&((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))))&(((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)))&((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0))|~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0 @ esk1_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_11]), c_0_16]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.41	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.41	# Parsed axioms                        : 29
0.15/0.41	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.15/0.41	# Initial clauses                      : 26
0.15/0.41	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
0.15/0.41	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
0.15/0.41	# Processed clauses                    : 9
0.15/0.41	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.41	# ...subsumed                          : 5
0.15/0.41	# ...remaining for further processing  : 3
0.15/0.41	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/0.41	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.41	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.15/0.41	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.41	# Generated clauses                    : 0
0.15/0.41	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.15/0.41	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.41	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.41	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.15/0.41	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.41	# NegExts                              : 0
0.15/0.41	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/0.41	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.41	# Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.15/0.41	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.15/0.41	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.41	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.15/0.41	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.15/0.41	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
0.15/0.41	# ...number of literals in the above   : 9
0.15/0.41	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.41	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.15/0.41	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.15/0.41	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.41	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/0.41	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.41	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.41	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.41	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.41	# Condensation attempts                : 9
0.15/0.41	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.41	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1258
0.15/0.41	
0.15/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.41	# User time                : 0.001 s
0.15/0.41	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.15/0.41	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.15/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
0.15/0.41	
0.15/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.41	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.15/0.41	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.15/0.41	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.15/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
0.15/0.41	EOF